Androgyny and Gifted Youth*

By Danae Deligeorge


“Our true nature is free of any and all notions of gender, of any notions of difference

whatsoever.”

~ Andrew Cohen ~


Stereotypes often invisibly reinforce ways to support sex-based discrimination. When

these stereotypes are internalized, girls and boys may lose the opportunity for

authenticity and the full-range of human experience, especially if they harbor

unwarranted concerns about sexual orientation or gender identity. Let’s try a quick test. How many different gender roles can you think of? I bet you thought of two. About 40 years ago, however, researchers identified four different gender roles. One of them is psychological androgyny.


What is psychological androgyny? Results of a Google search indicate an array of

possibilities: simply wearing clothing usually associated with the opposite sex (from an

online blog); having traditional male and female roles obscured or reversed (Webster

online dictionary); the state of being neither distinguishably masculine nor feminine as in dress, appearance, or behavior (Online Free Dictionary); in terms of gender identity, an “androgyne” is a person who does not fit cleanly into the typical masculine and feminine roles of their society (Wikipedia). Do you have a clear answer? If you say “yes,” I’m sorry; you probably do not.


Again, what is androgyny? If Google does not supply sufficient answers, research may.

Sandra Bem (1977) constructed the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI), one of the most

widely used gender measures. Based on the responses to the terms in the Bem Sex

Role Inventory, individuals may be classified as having one of four gender-role

orientations: androgynous, female or male who has a high degree of both feminine

(expressive) and masculine (instrumental) traits; feminine, female or male who is high

on expressive traits and low on instrumental traits; masculine, female or male who is

high on instrumental traits and low on expressive traits, or unidentified; female or male

who is low on both feminine and masculine traits. The terms gender, gender-role,

sexual orientation, and gender-identity, imply distinctions that should not be confused. A person’s gender can be either male or female, but her or his gender-role may be

masculine, feminine, undifferentiated or androgynous. Sexual orientation relates to

one’s sexual preferences, so a person can be heterosexual, bisexual or homosexual.

Last but not least, gender-identity is a person’s private sense of this his or her gender,

based on subjective experiences. In other words and related to our topic, psychological

androgyny is not synonymous with biological distinctions, and sexual orientation has

nothing to do with gender-role and gender-identity.


How is androgyny connected to giftedness and creativity? According to Silverman

(1993), Tolan (1997), Sheely (2000), Piirto (2004), Kerr (1997), Kerr & Cohn (2001)

many highly gifted and creative children tend to be androgynous. Jonsson and Carlsson

(2000) observed that those who were evaluated using the BSRI and scored as highly

androgynous and low, undifferentiated also displayed higher creative functioning.

According to Sheely (2000) few highly gifted people conform to gender-role stereotypes and therefore are more androgynous. Tolan (1997) has also found that highly gifted children are more androgynous than other children; they tend to reject strict gender identities. In other words, psychological androgyny should be considered a trait of g